Puerto Rico walks away from commonwealth. Essays - Americas

Puerto Rico walks away from commonwealth. I will not pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands. This must be the words of thousands of Puerto Ricans living in the island today wishing that their small island would once and for all become free from the colonization of the United States. Puerto Rico has been living under U.S. domination for the past 92 years and it's considered the last nation in Latin America that is still living in colonization. Puerto Ricans want to be free and should be allowed to be free; to have the opportunity to vote for the president who sends its young people to war, to have their own currency, to fly one flag in all their schools and finally to feel pride in being an independent nation and not labeled with terms like "territory" and "commonwealth". Bigger and more powerful nations that inhabit smaller nations for various benefits should never deny a nation's culture and roots, instead in these modern times people should be allowed to govern themselves and be independent nations. In the midst of the struggle over status (U.S commonw ealth or Independency) only one clear realization can come of this, Puerto Rico ought to be independent and refuse commonwealth to the United States of America. One of the many benefits citizens from all democratic countries enjoy is the ability to choose their chief in command. As a commonwealth under the United States, Puerto Rican citizens cannot vote during the presidential campaign. They are allowed to participate in presidential primaries but not the final event. This is somewhat of an insult to the younger generation on the island being sent off to fight wars representing the U.S. having been denied the privilege to choose the person who is sending them. As an independent nation Puerto Ricans would have the right to participate in elections choosing who their leader would be. The island does have its own elections where they get to choose who will become governor and other various members of the political cabinet but all of these have limited power in deciding the fate of the island. The Governor is allowed to run the island and handle domestic issues but Washington has the final word. This struggle for power has also affected the economy and the ability to export and carry out trades with other nations; United Sates keeps a tight hold on who the island does business with, ultimately creating a dependent economy. Puerto Rico should be allowed to diversify their sources of capital and their export market something that would strengthen its economy and eliminate the economic dependency that has been created throughout the years. Many in the island believe that independency would allow Puerto Rico to open a broader trading market and as stated by Eric Negron, tax adviser to the independence party, "as an independent nation Puerto Rico could attract foreign investment and it would at the same time be better able to direct what sort of industries is brought to the island." Remaining a commonwealth takes all of these economic privileges away from the people and the government of Puerto Rico who want to see the island's economy soar to a new level. Nations across the world can be proud of their heritage and culture, which makes up their country and it's the backbone to each individual society. A nation's language is a stamp of their history; the DNA that makes up its people. Puerto Rico as a commonwealth could be in danger of losing its national language. Spanish has been the island's national language since the Spanish conquistadors first discovered it in 1492. United Sates wants Puerto Rico to make the change from Spanish to English and demands that both Spanish and English be the national languages; too many schools across the island have already made the transaction and now teach in both languages. Being a Puerto Rican is not being part of an ethnic group or speaking Spanish is not speaking a dialect; these citizens are people who have their own language and roots and deserve the right to conserve their heritage and most important their culture. However, as a person born in

smartphone Essay Example

smartphone Essay Example smartphone Essay smartphone Essay Smartphone? Snare one! Smartphones, does it make us more smart? A smartphone is a very advanced technology. It is also used every single day in our lives. They help and give us the information that we need such as any business-related matters, a toy for a kid or a device that will give us entertainment. This may sound that it is a very good thing, but it is unfortunately not. Therefore, I will precisely explain the reasons why I am against Smartphones. Smartphones are great when using for communication purposes but it is making us less smart as most of the people use it more often than we are upposed to. People have become less socially interactive due to their dependence and obssession in Smartphones. For instance, there are people that would constantly check their Smartphone while walking or doing other activities such as hanging out with their friends or having a date. This shows that people are not aware of their surroundings as they are always busy doing something on their Smartphone. This leads to lack of social interaction and may cause the person to not get used to talking to other people in person. Therefore, people should converse with other people, not with the Smartphones. Smartphones are becoming an extension of the human brain. People are being dependent to the Smartphones by using it as a GPS in order to remind the user about the upcoming events such as birthdays, assignment due dates, work-out routines that should be done on a particular date and more. These events and reminders are supposed to be remembered and stored in the brain, and our brains are supposed to be the one reminding the us these information. Therefore, this enables the brain to be more active and aware about our surroundings. Furthermore, by using the Apple iOS application Siri, people would not ften be bothered to search the information themselves as according to the Apple website, Siri .. understands what you say, knows what you mean, and even talks back. Siri is so easy to use and does so much, youll keep finding more and more ways to use it. Smartphones makes us less productive. Smartphone is a tool that has everything in it. According to the article that I have read, they did a survey in their company in order to find out the difference of the employees with and without a Smartphone while working in their workplace. The result shows that having a Smartphone during work makes everyone to be less productive. Smartphones are a huge distraction while working as there are a range of activities that a person can do in it such as e-mails, text and video messaging, phonecalls, playing games, taking down notes and more. Therefore, the employees think that Smartphones are very reliable when working although in reality, it is not. having Smartphones is a problem itself as it is a device that can do what the brain does. it would have been better if it was built into something that the brain cannot do. Creation of Smartphones is like uilding the escalator when you already have the stairs, it does not help us use our muscles and brains in order to remember simple and important information and events that we need and are happening in our lives. I agree to a psychological fact that says use it or lose it as this applies to our daily lives when using Smartphones such as remembering directions using our brain instead of using a GPS application brains can do. There is a huge impact to children when they use Smartphones. Smartphones separate the children from the principle of social interaction. Smartphones are designed to entertain the youth and adults but this discourages the children from interacting with the other kids as they do not really talk to each other using their mouth, but they Just type the words that they want to say on their Smartphone and sends it to their peers. The Smartphone also lowers their confidence towards other people. Smartphones can also ruin the childs brain development. Rather than doing physical activities such as running and Jumping with all the other children, they Just sit on the corner pressing, swiping and tilting their Smartphone screens. This can also affect the childrens health as they are often less mobile while playing with their Smartphones compared to what a usual kid would do. This results to children not having enough physical exercise that could result to being unfit and overweight or could develop any sickness or disease that may arise from insufficient physical activities. In conclusion, Smartphones are great for communication but it makes us less smart as it makes us less productive. Also, having a smartphones is the problem itself as it is a device that can do what the rain does and it has a huge destructive impact on the childrens generation Furthermore, Smartphones are becoming an extension of the human brain. The statements above are clearly enough to prove that Smartphones actually makes people less smart. Although there are several reasons on why Smartphones are useful, its negative consequences of using and owning one still outweigh its positive features; especially when it is used more often than normal. Therefore, people must try not to depend on it too much and this will be achieved if people would use Smartphones wisely and moderately.

A Discussion and Analysis of Russia versus Europe within the Realm of Essay

A Discussion and Analysis of Russia versus Europe within the Realm of Global Politics - Essay Example However, the Russian Federation, the dominant neighbor in the north, insists upon the fact that Ukraine should reject this proposal of European integration and pursue a path of Eurasian partnership, in tandem with Russia and several other former Soviet bloc countries. In defining the situation, the author focuses upon the fact that the Russian Federation, led by Vladimir Putin, is playing a very aggressive and mean-spirited game of realpolitik, one that ultimately places the Russian Federation at odds with the remainder of the world. The first level of discussion that the author engages is the fact that the Russian Federation has recently captured the attention of the world not with respect to any positive news; rather, they had captured the attention of the world with regard to the mistreatment, ridicule, and illegality of homosexuality that has been propagated throughout the media and public domain within the Russian Federation for the past several months. In tandem with this, the author also discusses the increasingly authoritarian style and the Russian Orthodox Church, as well as key industries and state owned enterprises that able to influence the population within the Russian Federation. Moreover, a discussion of the heavy-handed anti-western tactics related to the way in which state media represents the West within the Russian Federation is also covered. In short, something of a psychoanalysis of the leader Vladimir Putin himself is engaged as a means of helping the reader to understand a very warped and m isaligned worldview that is engaged currently with respect to the manner in which international politics is practiced within the Russian Federation, and via the vehicles of policy development that Vladimir Putin personally encourages. Ultimately, what can be understood from the perspective of international politics is a situation as old as state interaction itself. Ultimately, the Russian Federation, arguably one of the pain superpowers within the world, is seeking a way in which it can leverage former colonies, territories, and compliments of the Empire to integrate with its needs rather than following a path of further integration and divorce from the Russian Federation towards the European Union. As a function of such reality, something of a frantic and frenetic response has been engaged whereby the Russian Federation is willing and able to actively meddle in the internal affairs of its neighbors as a means of affecting these goals. Further, it can be also be deduced that the act ions of the Russian Federation over the past several months and years cannot and should not be seen as somehow unique (Keller 1). Rather, other powers, including the United States, had acted in a similar fashion by utilizing any and all mechanisms and power at their means as a function of convincing, co-opting, and coercing individual states and groups of states to integrate with them in a particular manner. However, what is unique about the Russian Federation and the situation that is thus far been defined is that Vladimir Putin is willing to go so far in casting the differential between the West and the Russian Federation that impinging upon the human rights of homosexuals and promoting conspiracy theories as a means of defining and describing the world has not only come to be utilized; rather, it is come to be something of a modus